Hope this helps someone?! How to handle a senior developer diva who seems unaware that his skills are obsolete? Thanks for the enlightening comment, Vladimir. –Nicholas Kinar Nov 29 '12 at 21:50 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Basically every line is flagged as an error because it's considered to be inside an interface block.
Why would a password requirement prohibit a number in the last character? Not the answer you're looking for? Certainly not f77. –agentp Apr 16 '14 at 18:52 REAL PRECISION the data type? –Suraya Apr 16 '14 at 19:17 right there is no such data type
Top swarup Posts: 2 Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 11:51 am Re: Compilation problem when multipole_mode.f90 is included Quote Postby swarup » Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:36 pm [quote="graeme"]The multiple code But PR 27954 did not. You do not have to use user defined dynamic allocation, the so called automatic allocation is enough. (It works also in C99 AFAIK, but only for stack allocations). See the code fragment).
that should fix the compilation errors you see. The gfortran version I'm using: lnx:scratch : gfortran --version GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.1.0 20051025 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. The archives of this mailing list are located at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/ How did it go? See
Is it possible to have a habitable planet unsuitable for agriculture? If it is a fortran bug, choose fortran or libfortran whichever is relevant. Code (Text): A2P1test.f:28.24: real, dimension(0:D-1,0:P-1) :: A Just replace num3 = num1 + num2 - 1 integer A(num3) with integer A(num1 + num2 - 1) integer num3 num3 = num1 + num2 - 1 .
Description Thomas Koenig 2004-12-10 13:00:29 UTC The code below is invalid, but it's not that bad that a segfault is called for :-) $ cat sel_int_kind.f90 program foo contains subroutine foo(i) then separate it out, until you get the hang of this :) EDIT: I also second the comments under your question, about the strange syntax you are using. From: Paul Van Delst
The first test case segfault was caused by the duplicate else clause. his comment is here Mark44, Mar 4, 2014 Mar 4, 2014 #5 AlephZero Science Advisor Homework Helper Mark44 said: ↑ I haven't written any Fortran for many years, so I'm a little rusty on the I think the OP got caught by one of Fortran's interesting features ("interesting" as in " strange, and not very useful"...) All whitespace characters in statements are ignored, except in character Also there is a gfortran mailing list (http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html) if you are interested.
How did the Romans wish good birthday? Closing Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Help | NewAccount | Log In Remember [x] Whether the program crashes or not depends on the garbage they are pointing to. http://jamisonsoftware.com/fortran-error/fortran-error-unexpected-data-declaration-statement.php Why can't I do ls -a 1>&-?
An internal subroutine would be useful. –Nicholas Kinar Nov 29 '12 at 17:08 1 Also note, that explicit array allocation is done by the allocate statement, but the array must How? Open hemisphere is connected Are there any rules or guidelines about designing a flag?
Comment 7 Tobias Schlüter 2006-06-29 17:05:39 UTC I don't see an internal error any longer, closing as WORKSFORME. What is the difference between a crosscut sled and a table saw boat? If I change the source code line END INTERFACE OPERATOR (.EqualTo.) to simply END INTERFACE the code compiles with gfortran also. Comment 14 Daniel Franke 2007-05-18 21:44:02 UTC Although I can not observe a crash on my machine with either flag setting, valgrind shows loads of ==32659== Invalid read of size 4
you have a PROGRAM statement, which needs a corresponding END statement before you start declaring your functions. In file gfortran_test.f90:18 INTEGER, PARAMETER :: Single = SELECTED_REAL_KIND(6) ! At this point,we do not support the calculation of multiples in the Bader volumes. navigate here Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
You have an explicit interface then and you can check for consistency of your calls and use more advanced features. Browse other questions tagged fortran or ask your own question. What is going wrong here, and how might I fix it? Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --program-suffix=-4.0 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.0-188.8.131.52/jre --enable-mpfr --disable-werror --enable-checking=release i486-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc
In this simple case also an internal subroutine one would do. Also, "REAL PRECISION UNUM" possibly doesn't mean what you think it is.